Ford Transit USA Forum banner

MPG for 3.2 Diesel Powerstroke Thread....

320K views 172 replies 67 participants last post by  3.2transit350xlt  
#1 ·
Thought I'd be the one to start the "official" MPG for the 3.2 thread. Try to post your numbers and note which rear end gear ratio you have. Also please note the total mileage on your van....
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterR
#2 · (Edited)
Real curious to see this go down.

I get on the low side of what lots of guys claim with my 3.0 V6 2013 Sprinter 3500.

The Nag 5 blows.Full stop.

Savvy sprinter drivers massage around it with scan gauge monitoring, but day in day out, the Fords got to be better in the trans space.

Im guessing 6 to 6 the transmission in the ford wins the round.

Of course the smaller benz with the 7 speed gets better mileage than the 3.2, but how does it run and last at rated weight?

UD
 
#3 · (Edited)
Uncle Dave, this thread is intended for Transit owners with the 3.2 diesel to report actual MPG results. The following forum might be a better place to discuss Transit vs. Sprinter general issues, and you would be most welcome to start your own topic there, or to post in one of the existing threads.

http://www.fordtransitusaforum.com/ford-transit-versus-competition/

Thank you in advance for your understanding, that this MPG sub-forum will work best for all if the posts here stay on-topic.

Peter
 
#4 ·
Uncle Dave, this thread is intended for Transit owners with the 3.2 diesel to report actual MPG results. The following forum might be a better place to discuss Transit vs. Sprinter general issues, and you would be most welcome to start your own topic there, or to post in one of the existing threads.

Ford Transit Versus The Competition - Ford Transit USA Forum

Thank you in advance for your understanding, that this MPG sub-forum will work best for all if the posts here stay on-topic.

Peter
Got it.

New guy here didnt pay attention to where I put the post.


UD
 
#12 ·
Just some quick inputting:
1- First tank avg had 22.1 on computer and 20.85 calculated;
2- Around town, Orlando, avg traffic, no why's got about 21.8 computer;
3- On Hwy, resetting computer every 50 miles or so, notice Van mpg VERY sensitive to speed, guess mostly due to the HR. 25.3 mpg at 55 mph, 22.8 mpg at 65 mph and 21.5 mpg at 75 mph. Wind direction will also affect results a lot.
My van is a 250, diesel, srw, 3.31 LS, HR.
Van had no load, empty. 600 miles on odometer.
Thanks for the details Gianz. Interesting what a difference the 3.31 rear end seems to make on the mileage IMO.
 
#17 ·
Today I filled up, probably 60% city and 40% highway at 72 miles per hour - averaged 16.8 mpg. Probably have 800 lbs of cargo currently. I have a t250 148 mid length mid roof 3:73 rear end with 3.2 diesel.
Seems like the 3.31 rear end makes a difference, esp. with Larry getting good MPG with the long and tall . . .
 
#19 ·
Thanks everyone for the mpg reports! I'm hoping for mpg between 23 and 25 with a low roof, 3:31 short wheel base, sure glad I did not order the EB.

Epps
 
#20 ·
Will post as soon as we put enough miles on it calculate mpg. So far we have 25 miles. ;-)
 
#23 ·
We have whole whopping 165 miles on the Beast (formerly known as the vacamobile). Miles are pretty well mixed between rural and highway. Computer-generated MPG is 16.7; and increasing with every mile. More later!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterR
#22 ·
Our drivers report mileage daily and the boss made a copy of the fuel bill for February so I have fairly accurate numbers though with the oversize tires we checked it out to be 5% over. Taking it all in for February we ran almost 8300 miles and used 424 gallons for a 19.75 MPG average. Big note is that I checked the idle hours vs. running hours and we are idling this thing at 35% of the running hours. I'm not happy with that but its to the passengers so we just have to deal with it.
 
#24 ·
Ok new here but my 3.2l hr el i did two loads 2200lbs. Each, 4 fillups avg. speed cruise @ 68mph. 21.82mpg 23.09mpg 19.45mpg (had idle time) 21.27mpg. Route holland, mi to wilington, DE to trenton, nj to florence, al. All other average 17-19mpg local driving. I use the mileage app.
 
#25 ·
thesire: Welcome to the forum! What roof height, wheel base, and rear gears do you have?

Epps
 
#29 ·
Round trip mid Mo.to Dayton beach Fl. towing 7/16 ft tandem axle trailer.
72-75 mph on cruise.13.8 south-14.2 north 14 mpg avg.
250 ext high roof 331 rear.
Have been avg. 18.5 mixed local driving. All figures hand calculated
Thanks for reporting. I'm curious, how tall is your trailer, and about how much does it and van weigh? Even a rough estimate is better than nothing in order to put data in context.

Any chance you have a picture of van with trailer combo you can post?

By the way, how did it tow? Did you have downshifts on hills, enough power for merging, etc...? Anything you'd want different?
 
#31 ·
Thanks again. I read somewhere that Monteagle TN is one of the toughest Interstate climbs in one direction, with grade above the standard maximum which required a waiver. Not sure how accurate the report was/is.

If that's the section you are referring to, and you were hauling a combined weight around 10,000 pounds (I guess-estimated empty weights for your van and trailer), it confirms that an engine with approximately 200 HP can meet my needs comfortably. Even if you were hauling a lot more weight and could only hold 50 to 55 MPH on such a grade, I would be satisfied with that.

For my needs the diesel (or standard V6 by comparison) appears to have plenty of power. Thanks for feedback.
 
#33 ·
Our first fill-up today. 325 miles. 18.8 hand calculated; 17.9 per Transit. We figure about another 5 or 6 fill-ups before it starts leveling out. But we'll take this for the 1st one. Just 2 of us with no other load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Epps and PeterR
#42 ·
2nd fill-up. 18.3 hand calculate; 18.0 per Transit. Just under 600 total miles. This time was mainly in town/country roads and just the 2 of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobojay and PeterR
#36 ·
calculated: 21.1, computer: 19.6 mpg, odo: 534 mi.: city only, manual only, empty van.
Cat Scales 5740 lb.

Ajaxgrac14: Two Questions;


1. 534/19.6=27.5 Gallons? I thought we're dealing with a 25 gallon tank? Is this one fill up?

2. How are you handling the manual regent?


Epps
 
#37 ·
I missed a data point, so i used the trip meter(reset to 0) which was 116 mi. and filled the tank with 5.5 gal.

I haven't used man regen or even read the manual yet. The reading on the DEF has read 15-85% and back down to 30%. I don't know if the system is automatically cleaning or defective or what.
 
#38 ·
Ajaxgrac14: Thanks, I understand now. I would fill the DEF, you don't want that to run empty. Your van should be running cleaning cycles as needed to keep the CAT clean by it's self. The advantage of the manual regen is to allow you to start or delay the burning, ie your showing that a burn is needed soon and your on the highway with 20 - 25 miles to go. You can start it and get the burn completed before you need to shut down. Or if your close to needing a burn, you can delay it and allow it to start next time you take it out.

Epps

Hay, I became a "Senior Mmeber" with this post..... maybe I'll cantch up to PetterR?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobojay and PeterR