picture of 5/8 (.625) diameter counterbore, this one has a pilot shank dia. of .125, McMASTERCARR lists 2 .625 dia. CB, .125 dia. pilot and .188 dia. pilot. I would opt. for the larger pilot for increased stiffness.
...
Super helpful,
@kazuo. I think part of my problem is that I was HOPING to find a single counterbore with the pilot bit built in - so I'm not drilling twice. Any insight why the separate-pilot setup might be more common / superior?
I tried creating my own anchor fastener holes on 10-series 8020 using the Tnutz 2-flute end mill in my drill press, and it did not go very well. I built a jig with 8020 as mentioned above, but it did not help much. There was WAY too much slop in the quill of my drill press. The end mill wandered significantly, resulting in a hole that was severely oval shaped. Oddly, this setup cut just fine until the very last 1/16" of depth. I couldn't figure out why the last little bit of depth caused all the trouble. I was able to use anchor fasteners in the holes and make the connection needed, but I intend to replace it when I place my next Tnutz order.
...
That's exactly what I'm expecting without a pilot. And that's the exact drill-press I have, so... likely identical experience.
Hm... leading me more and more toward just the end-connectors and/or try the new T-matics. 🤔
I assumed you were referring to the "anchor fasteners" I have seen many here use. Part # 3360 for 15 series. What is the part number for the second machined connector?
Correct. That is the, "anchor connector." These are the, "
end fasteners," I mentioned: they require an access hole (no precision, really) and threading the center of the extrusion. But they're similar strength to the anchors.
The internal connector part # 3364 is the one that failed in the Sprinter build. The set screws did loosen due to the small set screw point contact area. Maybe they would work if installed with Locktite? I replaced them with DIY angle connectors.
I used a bunch of those on our Sprinter (in 20mm and 30mm) then used a bunch on the Transit (30mm) and started using a dab of Loctite... then realized that they
shouldn't need Loctite if the mechanism were working correctly (bending the arms of the slot) - thus realizing they weren't working as intended. Then I had a couple break. Then I saw the chart on just HOW weak they are (like 50 pounds break point) and I'll only use them for intermediate connectors with no strength expectation.
My experience with simple cheap DIY angle and flat bar connectors has been positive. No issues when used with carriage bolts. I do understand that the machined connections are much stronger than what I did. The question is if that stronger connection is necessary in our van conversion applications?
Agreed. No issues for me, either. But they make flush panels look crappy and difficult to cut.
I figured they were plenty strong - and perhaps they are - until seeing how much stuff in my brother's van looked like a child pulled apart their Legos after the accident.
Basically, I'm trying to do EVERYTHING more solid in this van. As much as I tend to take my own life in my hands - not just driving but climbing, trail-running, split-boarding, more - and I'm pretty cavalier with my adult sons' lives... I find I am a bit of, "not good enough for my grandsons' lives," on this now. The babies are both under two years old and I'm suddenly asking myself, "how can I make things MORE safe/secure," in ways that I previously wouldn't have done.
So, I'm exploring the alternative connectors for everything in this van - not just the 8020 stuff. The seat was expensive and it took a lot of work to get it really secured but I'm MUCH more confident in the safety of the seat - and I'll be putting the same one in the old van - using the same method. The bed is through-bolted more solidly than the last van. The fridge/freezer are through-bolted, unlike the old van. I don't know how everything will end up being done - I've already gone BACK on some ideas as just not being worth the effort - but I'm exploring options and trying to lean more toward, "how well/strong/safe can I reasonably do this?" than previously.
Sometimes, think it's just that I'm getting old... but I still see it as valuing my own life so much that I have to live it aggressively - like the young idiot I must still be at some level. But the protection I've felt for my wife - which was never quite as strong toward my boys - seems to be turned UP when it comes to my baby grandsons.
People also use a variety of nuts in the slot to obtain a treaded hole. I found that the inexpensive two and three hole "economy T-nuts" work better than the other more expensive choices. With two hole economy nuts I put a bolt in one of the holes to give me a "handle" to move the nut in the slot to where I want it. Once located a set screw in the second threaded hole locks nut in place. Makes adding a threaded hole in vertical extrusions much easier than single nuts. The three hole economy nut is used where I need two bolts to keep the attached part from rotating. Set screw in center hole. Disadvantage is you must have access to extrusion end to insert the nuts.
Agreed on all counts. Except that many of the nuts - roll-ins or rotating - can be purchased in bulk pretty affordably - so I use all three types, depending on the application. Flat are least convenient and most solid/secure. Rotating are almost as solid but hard to nail-down location if it's a blind install. Roll-ins with springs are best for blind installs. Then there's roll-ins with arms... and more. I've used as many as I can find just to see how they all work.
You are correct, I don't have the ability to hold that kind of tolerance and like the gussets much better. It depends on the project goals of course.
To the point of the above, I'll be using gussets as well.
