Ford Transit USA Forum banner

Highest mileage transits

117598 Views 213 Replies 61 Participants Last post by  Guri
This maybe a bit early;),but I thought I would post this anyway:). Here's the rules.

ANY TRANSIT
ONLY USE MILES for our Canadian owners (aah:laugh:) convert to miles
ROUND OFF TO THE NEARSET 100

OK, I'll start 10,100 MILES
101 - 120 of 214 Posts
I like to monitor the expeditor forums, as they accumulate a lot of miles which serves to make them canaries in the coal mine, so to speak.

This guy has just under 90,000 miles on his Transit and had some recent worrisome issues and pretty long parts lead times.

http://www.expeditersonline.com/forums/threads/sprinter-170-extended-4-x-4-payload-capacity.67163/

Just one van, but a data point nevertheless.
Data point taken. Diesels scare me, but not as much as dealer mechanics.
86,000 miles and it's time for rear brakes. With the amount of highway mileage this does, I'm a bit surprised. Our price at NAPA for the Ultra Premium, Severe Duty pads was $.30 less than the dealer, but, NAPA doesn't have them in stock so they would have to be shipped in with freight. At Ford, they are on backorder but for a nominal fee of $10, they can expedite them. Still a better deal.

NAPA didn't even list the rotors and because of the design, I doubt they can turn them for less than the $47 ea. I'll pay at Ford. Of course the rotors are next day available but not the pads. That doesn't make sense, but it is what it is.

I'll take the used rotors down to the machine shop and see exactly what it would take to turn them. If it's reasonable, I may just have them do it and stick them on the shelf for next time which will probably be late next Summer.
See less See more
You have the pull the axle to get the rears off. Might want to have a set of hub seals handy.

Edit: Most of the brake fasteners are torque to yield, one use type.
86,000 miles and it's time for rear brakes. With the amount of highway mileage this does, I'm a bit surprised.
I read someone did theirs at 35K. I have a theory on this... that traction control brain that pulses your brakes 40,000 time a second (or something like that) any time it senses differing rotational speeds (every tight right turn), is constantly and stealthily eating the rear pads. What say you to that?
Alarmist, the hub doesn't come off. The rotor is unbolted, turned 1/10 of a turn and removed. Someone had posted a picture of that elsewhere. I will ask the dealer about those bolts.

Jon, I don't buy it. Traction control should know the difference between a spin and a turn and not come on every time you make a turn.
Agree it's weak, but there must be something different going on because rear brakes usually last way longer than fronts.
I just replaced the rear pads and rotors on my wife's '07 Camry (that we bought new) @ 60,000 miles. They were shot. Went ahead and did the front and they probably had another 10,000 miles left. I found it strange as well.

Her car doesn't have traction control.
Alarmist, the hub doesn't come off. The rotor is unbolted, turned 1/10 of a turn and removed. Someone had posted a picture of that elsewhere. I will ask the dealer about those bolts.

Jon, I don't buy it. Traction control should know the difference between a spin and a turn and not come on every time you make a turn.
Step one: Remove axle shaft. It has an o-ring seal on it. After that, yes, you turn the rotor 72º, and pull it off. Might also want to have a bit of differential fluid handy.
Am I understanding this correctly: the rear axles have to be removed to replace the rear brake rotors?
Yes. Easy though. You mark it so it gets put back the way it came out, then pull the five bolts which also hold the rotor. duallies are slightly different, with additional bolts holding the rotor. You also get to buy all new bolts.

Attachments

See less See more
2
Moral of this story is really keep an eye on those pads so you hopefully never have to buy a rotor.
As for high rear brake wear- Ford supposedly has done some kind of weird brake sequencing where the rear brakes are the primary stopping mechanism on the Transit- when the computer senses they are nearing lockup then the computer applies more front brakes...something about improving vehicle stability and reducing front end dive.
Every other vehicle I've ever owned wears out front pads at 3-4X the rate of the rear pads.
So since the Transit uses the rear brakes more- lets put the smaller rotors on that end just like we did when the front did most of the braking...



BTW my 96 F350 front disks require the 4x4 locking hubs and all the bearings etc to come off to get the rotor off, which is inboard of the hub, instead of on the outer side like most.
See less See more
Yes. Easy though. You mark it so it gets put back the way it came out, then pull the five bolts which also hold the rotor. duallies are slightly different, with additional bolts holding the rotor. You also get to buy all new bolts.
For a part that is subject to routine maintenance, that has got to be one of the biggest bonehead designs that I'm familiar with.

It must be designed that way to retain the rotors on the axle assembly in shipment (in transit? :) ) from the vendor to the assembly plant.

How does it just "come right out"? No slide hammer required? :) I'm guessing that the axle bearings are in the part that the outer flange bolts to? Almost like a "full floater" axle design?

In my experience, once a set of pads is worn out, there isn't enough material left on the rotor to last through another set of pads.

I would guess that the axle seals would need to be replaced too, unless the outer flange is a gasket surface.

And people think that brake jobs on the Sprinter are expensive... at least the rotor comes off without pulling the axle :)
See less See more
Sprinters are easy.

As to the rotors being worn out with one set of pads, sometimes that is true. Sometimes because the rotors are thin and cheap, sometimes, because the pads are so hard. But most times, they can be turned. I do a couple of brake jobs a month so I get a pretty good idea.

Why the rears first? I'm sure Budsky has it right. VW does the same thing, but it's not as dramatic on my Jetta which the fronts had maybe 10,000 more miles on them than the rears. I know that with VW, under light braking, most of the braking is at the rear, but when you really need it, the bias shifts to the front. Assuming that this is the same on the Transit, our drivers are pretty careful drivers - especially with passengers - so most of the braking will be light braking. The fronts on our Transit have at least 1/2 if not 3/4 life left. And since the fronts are more important under heavy braking, I can understand why it would be important to have the bigger brakes on the front. When you need them RIGHT F'N NOW, the front will do most of the work so you want the big ones up there. Under most driving conditions, the rears will do just fine. Even with seals and bolts, I'll still only be into it for about $200.

I went out and measured the axle flange and measured the inner part of the brake rotor and sure, enough, the axle has to come out. So there is one O-ring sealing the flange. Poop those flange bolts out and it'll come right out since it's a full floating axle. Alarmist, which bolts are you saying that I will need. Nevermind... I just realized that I have the repair manual available to me through the county Library. It shows that I will need the caliper retaining bolts as well as the rotor bolts.
See less See more
. And since the fronts are more important under heavy braking, I can understand why it would be important to have the bigger brakes on the front. When you need them RIGHT F'N NOW, the front will do most of the work so you want the big ones up there.
Yes you want big ones up front- but>

Ford could have put big brakes in the back too-
obviously there is room in the wheels for at least the size of the fronts, maybe more.

BTW a quick search of the net reveals this has been an issue on other late model Fords as well...
By this time on the Promaster forum just about everyone had at least one issue that needed dealer attention and they were all build quality related. Squeaking brakes and suspension, sliding doors that would not open due to cable stretch, spare tire mounts that failed, leaking marker light housings, numerous weird electrical issues, etc. and that's just the non-recall stuff.
Things are also pretty quiet on the late or current model Mercedes Sprinter front ;)
Things are also pretty quiet on the late or current model Mercedes Sprinter front ;)
That is because they are all in limp home mode so they are very quiet.
That is because they are all in limp home mode so they are very quiet.
Cute :)
  • Like
Reactions: 1
To modify an old saying-

90% of Sprinters ever made are still on the road.

The rest made it home.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
well, I lust turned 55,000 miles:eek:, which means in about 6,000 miles my "check Engine" lite should come on:crying:
101 - 120 of 214 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top