....
Let's see... I started my paragraph off with: "As for a developing real world problem that a boost gauge helps" offering a response to your statement: "If a boost gauge will show developing real-time problems, I don't know what those problems are." I guess boost leak isn't on your list. It's on mine.
Yeah, I think you are. Did you even read my post? I laid out exactly how I "realistically" use boost as a gauge and was even completely honest that it is an arbitrary demarcation. Your question has been answered, you just don't seem to like the answer. You don't seem to like how others use the information provide by a boost gauge. You don't seem to want to use boost as a deciding factor in how you drive your vehicle. You clearly have already made up your mind that monitoring boost is not worthwhile. THEN DON'T.
I will be using my ScanGauge on my Transit once it arrives and boost will be one of things I monitor. I will realistically use it similarly to the way I realistically use it on my Mazda.
My, my, and here I thought
I was in a pissy mood this morning!
If you had bothered to read my original question AND my follow-up questions, (and took a few minutes to think) you might have noticed I asked for reasons why one would use a boost gauge in "normal" driving. At your request, I defined what I meant by that.
I made it clear that I was not asking about use as a diagnostic once you knew something was wrong.
I made it clear that I was not asking about tuning applications.
I made it clear that I was not talking about racing.
I made it clear that I was looking for examples where the boost gauge gave an
early heads-up that a problem was starting, or a case where monitoring it in "normal" driving helped the normal driving.
You talk about your multi-color temperature display letting you know when it's inadvisable to stress the engine (as with a turbo boost). But you are monitoring temperature (not boost), to make that judgement. A good idea.
Unless you are saying that reading a boost gauge is the best way you can tell that you are pushing a cold or hot engine too hard, that good idea has nothing to do with boost readouts.
But instead, with your boost leak example, you cite an case where you used the gauge
after you already knew there was a problem.
Not the heads-up warning I was asking about.
I asked what (if any) advantages using a boost readout had over simply monitoring MPG, if your goal was to monitor and improve MPG.
And now about all you claim is that's the way you like it, and that for some odd reason you believe that I see no use for ever taking a boost reading. Well, I'm happy for you, but it still doesn't answer my question.
Other folks talked about using other available readouts in diagnostics and in "regular" operation, but so far no-one has answered my very simple question. Instead, I get the sense folks think I'm attacking having an auxiliary system monitor.
I did not trash the use of ScanGauge (or other OBD monitor). In fact, I agreed that there are some good real-time uses (as well as diagnostic uses).
That was never my point. I simply want to know if there is any reason to monitor boost PSI when tootling down the road. And if so, is it a better monitor than some other parameter? Like how is monitoring boost a better parameter than monitoring MPG for tracking and improving your MPG?
So, in short: No I didn't like your answer, simply because it didn't address the question I was asking.
Stan