150, 250 & 350 what is the difference? - Page 3 - Ford Transit USA Forum
 68Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #21 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 02:43:PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,043
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman View Post
I have a 2017 Transit 148WB, mid roof, 250 I have four wheel disk brakes, my 2017 low roof 130 WB 150 does not. Not sure what the other differences are.
You're saying that your low roof 2017 Transit has drums in the rear?

2015 MR LWB Transit 3.5l Ecoboost 'Vanilla'

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
86scotty is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 02:54:PM
Senior Member
 
Eiko's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 3,223
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1168 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman View Post
I have a 2017 Transit 148WB, mid roof, 250 I have four wheel disk brakes, my 2017 low roof 130 WB 150 does not.
Hard to believe. My base model 98 Forester have and 03 Dodge Grand Caravan had drums on the rear but I don't know if they do rear drums on even the cheapest cars anymore.

2017 T-250 Oxford White Cargo 148" HR EB 3.31 LSD.
Eiko is online now  
post #23 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 04:01:PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Coastal Ga
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 466 Post(s)
Put a 4000lb load in the back of the 150 and see the squat and driveability difference.

There is a difference.

Also, try selling your used 150 in 6 years to a contractor vs a 350. You'll probably get most of that money back on the 350.

Also, get in a wreck and have your insurance adjuster deny your claim for exceeding GCWR or gvwr and see how much you saved.

Or, even worse the guy you hit suing you for carrying too much weight, or a state you re traveling through pull your "commercial" vehicle over, put it on the scales , and write you a 700$ ticket for being too heavy.
joefromga is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #24 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 04:15:PM
Senior Member
 
Travlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: El Estado de la Estrella Solitaria
Posts: 2,305
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 853 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by joefromga View Post
Put a 4000lb load in the back of the 150 and see the squat and driveability difference.

There is a difference.

Also, try selling your used 150 in 6 years to a contractor vs a 350. You'll probably get most of that money back on the 350.

Also, get in a wreck and have your insurance adjuster deny your claim for exceeding GCWR or gvwr and see how much you saved.

Or, even worse the guy you hit suing you for carrying too much weight, or a state you re traveling through pull your "commercial" vehicle over, put it on the scales , and write you a 700$ ticket for being too heavy.
For someone building a conversion van that won't be putting two tons of build inside (struggling to imagine what that would entail), the 350 is either overkill, or ego stroking. Both of which will always cost more in any endeavor. That's been true since long before cars displaced horses.

If the need arises a 150 owner can replace springs, add air bags, rear anti-sway bar, etc. to make a 150 the better of what a 250 might be expected to deliver for less than Ford upcharges for the badge.

I have no need to aim at the 350 spec for a fun van, but I imagine that if the part replacement numbers stated above are accurate that it wouldn't be all that difficult to reach that level at very little additional cost. Still likely less than what the upcharge is from 150 to 350 that Ford asks at time of purchase. (Granted, commercial users are bound by the regs to purchase the right vehicle for the job) My expected use of the van will never involve loads approaching those specified for the 350. In all honesty, that aspect is more about Ford attorneys, DOT, and possibly insurance companies coming to terms than it is about the ability of the chassis to perform the work.

Because of this, I'm tickled to have the 150, knowing that there is very little difference between it and its siblings capabilities from a perspective of engineering and components utilized in their construction.

Funny you should mention selling it in a few years as I was on the other end of such a deal. Picked up a plumbing truck with under 40K miles for $18.5K. I don't find this price to be a problem after doing my research on the differences. If I get another 150K miles out of it I'll be even happier about that aspect. Less than 4% of the cars and trucks I've owned have been purchased new. My practical side can't stomach the depreciation hit as I leave the dealer lot.

2015 T150 148" MR
Ecobeast - 3.31 - Cargo

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Last edited by Travlin; 05-08-2018 at 04:44:PM.
Travlin is online now  
post #25 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 05:11:PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by joefromga View Post
Put a 4000lb load in the back of the 150 and see the squat and driveability difference.

There is a difference.

Also, try selling your used 150 in 6 years to a contractor vs a 350. You'll probably get most of that money back on the 350.

Also, get in a wreck and have your insurance adjuster deny your claim for exceeding GCWR or gvwr and see how much you saved.

Or, even worse the guy you hit suing you for carrying too much weight, or a state you re traveling through pull your "commercial" vehicle over, put it on the scales , and write you a 700$ ticket for being too heavy.
Hi Joe, thank you for your reply. I would like to ask if you put 4000 pounds in the back of a 150 and share with us what you found.

I am not too worried about selling it used but I would assume it would bring around $2200 less than a 350 would... but that is OK since I saved $2200 on the purchase.

I will not even be close to the load rating on the 150 so that is not my concern. If one is to tell me a 350 has bigger brakes, better springs, bigger axles, etc then I have no issue with paying for an upgrade. What I do take issue with is the "trust me it's better" mentality with zero proof anything is different. Can you specify exactly what is different so I can start looking up part numbers to better understand the differences. Trust me is not a satisfactory answer. This would be for long MR 2018 Transit Van.
SlowSBC is offline  
post #26 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 05:19:PM
Senior Member
 
Budsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,247
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travlin View Post
the 350 is either overkill, or ego stroking.

UNLESS you want a wagon in high roof and extended length. You HAVE to get a 350 to do that.
Travlin likes this.

"Beluga" 2015 350HD, 3.2D, 3.73, EL, HR, Van- Totalled
"Beluga II" 2018 350HD, 3.5EB, 3.73, EL, HR, Wagon
Budsky is online now  
post #27 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 05:20:PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travlin View Post
For someone building a conversion van that won't be putting two tons of build inside (struggling to imagine what that would entail), the 350 is either overkill, or ego stroking. Both of which will always cost more in any endeavor. That's been true since long before cars displaced horses.

If the need arises a 150 owner can replace springs, add air bags, rear anti-sway bar, etc. to make a 150 the better of what a 250 might be expected to deliver for less than Ford upcharges for the badge.

I have no need to aim at the 350 spec for a fun van, but I imagine that if the part replacement numbers stated above are accurate that it wouldn't be all that difficult to reach that level at very little additional cost. Still likely less than what the upcharge is from 150 to 350 that Ford asks at time of purchase. (Granted, commercial users are bound by the regs to purchase the right vehicle for the job) My expected use of the van will never involve loads approaching those specified for the 350. In all honesty, that aspect is more about Ford attorneys, DOT, and possibly insurance companies coming to terms than it is about the ability of the chassis to perform the work.

Because of this, I'm tickled to have the 150, knowing that there is very little difference between it and its siblings capabilities from a perspective of engineering and components utilized in their construction.

Funny you should mention selling it in a few years as I was on the other end of such a deal. Picked up a plumbing truck with under 40K miles for $18.5K. I don't find this price to be a problem after doing my research on the differences. If I get another 150K miles out of it I'll be even happier about that aspect. Less than 4% of the cars and trucks I've owned have been purchased new. My practical side can't stomach the depreciation hit as I leave the dealer lot.
So far the only difference I have found is the door sticker and rear emblem. I have looked up practically every part number on these Transits and they are all the same for the same style of vans between the 150, 250 and 350...
SlowSBC is offline  
post #28 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 06:14:PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Some excellent information.
Thanks everyone.
JerryG#910 is online now  
post #29 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 06:48:PM
Junior Member
 
Nowhereman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
I stand corrected my son drives the low roof and he said it had drums on my inspection it DOES have disks all the way around, sorry for the misinformation.
86scotty likes this.
Nowhereman is offline  
post #30 of 126 (permalink) Old 05-08-2018, 07:53:PM
Member
 
Ding Batt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cottonwood, AZ
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowSBC View Post
Besides the load ratings and the emblems on the back what is the difference between these 3 series? When I look up part numbers for axles, rotors, brakes, springs, frame rails, etc they all have the same part number. Is there any real difference between these 3 series of trucks or is it simply a liability thing for load ratings?
This subject has come up several times already on this forum and no one has ever come up with the answer. I'm sure that Ford is not selling you thin air for big bucks. I have yet to see anyone mention the possibility of thicker sheet metal at critical areas of the unibody to enable the van to actually carry more weight.

In the 70's a good Dodge mechanic co-worker and friend upgraded his 1/2 ton Dodge pickup truck to a 3/4 ton by swapping the rear axle and a lot of parts, except for the frame. The 3/4 ton had a thicker/stronger/heavier frame. The only way he could duplicate that would be to go out and buy a 3/4 ton truck.....do it right the first time around.
Eiko likes this.

Low Roof, 148" wb, 3.5 rocket power. "Stealthy" Touring Camper.
Ding Batt is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Future Transit Owner - 150/250/350 tobi123 Introductions 11 03-09-2018 06:28:PM
150 vs 250 vs 350 lhill7 Ford Transit General Discussion 20 06-25-2017 09:24:PM
T-150, T-250 or T-350 for campervan? GreyDawg Ford Transit General Discussion 35 04-01-2017 12:50:PM
the differences between 150/250/350? TransitFool Ford Transit General Discussion 5 01-15-2017 11:47:PM
150 vs 250? Hookspur Ford Transit General Discussion 5 11-19-2015 12:53:PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome